Speak to a BAILIFF Expert - £35
Lumsden v Burnett [1898] 2 QB
177
The collector of taxes distrained for a tax debt
of under 20.
A walking-possession agreement was
made with the debtor's daughter without his
consent. The outstanding tax was then settled, but
a demand was made for a fee of 15 shillings for the
man in possession which paid under protest. The
debtor then sued in the county court to recover
this amount.
Judge Chitty said "The document signed by the
plaintiff's daughter does not bind him as an
agreement: the daughter's signature was without any
authority express or implied on his part".
|